To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
unfortunately u miss the point; i only wanted to roll such information into a single article, where it can be easily accessed, rather than dozens of subpages; please note i didn’t nominate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Zambia for deletion, even though its laws are probably similar to those of benin — i think the benin page is there just for the sake of having a benin page which doesnt make much sense
as for liberty u., my enthusiasm for their mascot is limited at best; i simply think it passes (because of the notability of college sports), but would prefer that it be on the college’s main page, and i could probably be persuaded to think otherwise if i saw a good arguement
If I missed the point it is only because of your nomination where you described it as “barely notable” and a “vanity topic”. I’m glad to see you’ve changed your argument to something (only slightly) more substantial, but the fact remains that this article is on an important topic and could easily stand alone. The current size of the article is not all that important, stubs are acceptable and there is room to improve it over time. Nor is AfD the place to bring things you think should be merged.
Regarding Sparky, I don’t actually care what happens to that article. I can even see it might be worth keeping. The point was the ridiculous juxtaposition of your two comments, a perfect illustration of the systemic Western bias which plagues Wikipedia.